This study aimed to describe dative case verbs in Japanese syntactically
and semantically. Specifically, it aimed to explore the verbs that take an indirect
object (IO) in the construction of Japanese sentences. The theories used in this
research were the theory of Givon (2001), the theory of Tsujimura (1996), and
Nitta (1991). The data used in this research were the data obtained from Japanese
corpus. The research method used was descriptive analysis.
Starting from the ungrammatical use of double object constructions of
Japanese sentence which shows that in every Japanese sentence construction,
sometimes arguments by a case marker 'o' (accusative) is not attached to an
argument and even when the case marker appears, it is no more than one. So, if an
the marker 'ga' or 'o', is not attached to an argument, the marker 'ni' (dative) will
appear.
This reseach indicated that dative case verbs are verbs whose presence
would potentially take an indirect object (IO). In accordance with the claim of
Tsujimura (1996) and Nitta (1991) which states that the dative case [ni] is
essentially a marker associated with the verb give, and combined with a noun,
which implies to unravel a recipient (benefactive). The results of this reseach were
(1) The verbs that require the presence of an indirect object (IO) in Japanese
constructions is a transitive verb, with the marker ni, and (2) those verbs are
ageru 'give', oshieru 'teach', kureru 'give' and kau 'buy'. Semantically these verbs
are keizoku doushi ‘continuative verbs’.